Mehmet Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Story
Dream Singles review will explain to you the key top features of this resource for dating
March 6, 2020New driver takes care of loan, wonders why bank hasn’t sent title: Money Matters
March 6, 2020Mehmet Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Story

Mehmet Hassan had no basic indisputable fact that Leonie Granger, entering the casino with him here as seen on surveillance video, would be their death trap.
Three people had been found guilty of killing Mehmet Hassan, a professional gambler who had been killed in his London home back March 2014.
The murder occurred after Hassan ended up being lured in by a lady he knew as ‘Rachel,’ whom then permitted two other guys access to his flat, where he had been killed.
But ‘Rachel’ was actually 25-year-old Leonie Granger, who came across Hassan in a Mayfair casino shortly before his murder.
Regarding the of the killing, Hassan took Granger to the Palm Beach Casino and gave her money to gamble with night. They then traveled back again to Hassan’s Islington flat.
Granger Set Robbery Plot in Motion
But Hassan was unaware that Granger was actually working with her boyfriend, Kyrron Jackson, and his friend, Nicholas Chandler, setting up a plot. She made sure that the duo gained use of the flat before she left.
The two men then tangled up Hassan before brutally kicking him to death. They tore through his home looking for the funds they thought to be stashed in the apartment, as he had been known to keep cash in his home, in the place of depositing it right into a bank account.
Eventually, they found the cash. a video clip on Granger’s mobile phone revealed the three defendants playing with numerous £50 ($74) bills, stuffing them into their pants and throwing them around an area, along with one pretending to relieve himself on bills scattered across the floor of the flat.
Prosecutors say the video was made after Hassan’s death, while the defense claimed it was actually made four months earlier and was unrelated to the case.
But jurors were convinced that the three defendants were in charge of Hassan’s death, and all three were found guilty. Jackson and Chandler were convicted of murder, while Granger was found bad of this lower charge of manslaughter for her role into the criminal activity.
Whenever verdicts were delivered, Chandler begun to swear and lash out within the courtroom, forcing security officers to remove him from the court. Granger admitted to being part of an idea to rob Hassan, but said she had no role that is direct the murder, which may have led to her reduced conviction.
Jackson, Chandler Had History of Violent Crime
It was not the time that is first Jackson and Chandler was involved in violent crimes. In January and February of 2014, the set had been involved in two robberies that are armed A south Kensington casino. In all of those full instances, victims were tied up and the males carried weapons during the robberies.
Mehmet Hassan took Granger, who introduced under a different title, to gamble on his dime at London’s Palm Beach Casino Club. (Image: PA)
Hassan had been a member that is revered of London live casino gambling scene, and was said to regularly play poker at the Palm Beach Casino Club.
‘He had been a warm that is wonderful he would gamble on any such thing,’ Hendon Mob founder Ross Boatman told the London night Standard after his death. ‘He loved to gamble and, win or lose, it never affected him. He was always smiling, always upbeat.’
Jackson and Chandler were also convicted on fees of robbery, conspiracy to falsely imprison, along with other charges. Following the verdicts were read, Judge William Kennedy told the defendants which he expected them to face severe punishments due to their crimes.
‘You will return right here for sentence on Tuesday 28 April,’ Kennedy said. ‘we think you face very significant [time] and immediate custody.’
IOC Adopts Sports Betting Integrity Proposals
The IOC will implement recommendations that are new help combat corruption and match-fixing. (Image: IOC)
The Overseas Olympic Committee (IOC) has determined to adopt several new proposals to guard the integrity of Olympic sporting events after the first ever meeting regarding the International Forum for Sports Integrity (IFSI) in Lausanne on Monday.
The new initiatives will take care of lots of areas of the sports globe, including several that are focused on the recreations gambling industry.
Often, industry groups resist increased scrutiny and oversight, but that doesn’t appear to be issue in this situation.
Most regulated sports betting operations are in favor of protecting the integrity of games by any means feasible, as it protects their businesses as much as it helps the IOC, other activities organizations, players and fans.
For instance, the European Sports Security Association (ESSA) has said before it starts that they will be happy to work with the IOC to help stop match fixing.
‘Our company is pleased we could be part of this effort,’ ESSA Chairman Mike O’Kane said. ‘These measures are a milestone that is important the drive by sporting bodies plus the regulated betting industry to keep sport clean and protect consumers, regulated betting operators and athletes from unscrupulous activities.’
Hotline allowing for Anonymous Tips
One of the major initiatives from the IOC is a whistleblower hotline that will allow people to report match-fixing that is possible other corruption to the IOC.
The hotline, which will be based online, will offer complete anonymity to anybody who would like to use it, from people associated with the public to athletes, coaches or referees.
During the IFSI, governments worldwide were also strongly encouraged to sign to the Council of European countries’s convention against match-fixing, which ensures that local and laws that are national for cooperation with criminal investigations into match-fixing operations and properly punish methods that threaten the integrity of sporting competitions.
‘When it comes down to the battle against manipulation and associated corruption, sport needs the help and cooperation of governments and authorities that are governmental other stakeholders much significantly more than in almost any other area,’ said IOC President Thomas Bach.
The IOC isn’t taking every one of the responsibility for preventing match-fixing issues in sports worldwide, however. The organization says that FIFA and (in Europe) UEFA should remain the organizations that are go-to whistleblowers who would like to fight match-fixing in soccer.
And when it comes to performance drugs that are enhancing people with information should contact national organizations of the World Anti-Doping Agency.
No ‘Test’ for Match-Fixing
According to Bach, the new hotline is necessary because it is much more difficult to detect when a contest could be fixed in comparison with sniffing out cheaters who are using illegal substances.
‘you cannot detect corruption and match-fixing by taking a blood test,’ Bach stated. ‘we need the assistance and help of governments and police authorities who have even more power and a lot more information and more possibilities than sport may have.’
O’Kane consented with that evaluation, saying that education, partnerships as well as the effective exchange of information is central to how both the ESSA and the IOC want to protect the integrity of recreations.
‘Credit should go towards the IOC for continuing to include all responsible stakeholders in its integrity discussions once the best and way that is only be effective in this area,’ O’Kane stated. ‘As responsible, regulated betting operators we want to share data on match-fixing and all sorts of countries should ratify the Council of Europe Convention, which allows operators to fairly share confidential data in an environment that is protected established national platforms.’
California Internet Poker Committee Hearings Due Before End of April
Ca will hold hearings on the online poker question this month, it is there any a cure for regulation unless Pechanga has a big change of heart? (Image: blog.sfgate.com)
Ca is likely to get Senate that is joint and on the web poker committee hearings before May 1, which is the due date for policy committees to hear fiscal bills.
That means hearings are most likely to happen later this helped along by the fact that sponsors of the latest two ‘shell’ bills, Senator Isadore Hall and Assemblyman Adam Gray, are chairs of Senate and Assembly Government Organization committees month.
‘Nothing is finalized or approved, nevertheless the chairs of each committee are looking at holding a few joint hearings that are informational the issue so all the new users of each and every committee have a better comprehension of the complexities of Internet gambling,’ Senate GO Committee Director Art Terzakis said this week.
Terzakis ended up being unable to say exactly what the agenda associated with the hearing would look like and who does be testifying, explaining ‘it’s too very early for that.’
In fact, he believes the hearing that is first be ‘just an overview of gambling in California.’
Lack of Consensus
The passage of an internet poker bill in 2015 stays an unlikely prospect; a current report by Morgan Stanley said it foresaw no states opting to regulate in 2015, though it thought that Ca, along with Pennsylvania, brand new York and Illinois, would do this inside the ‘next few years. despite this small change into the right way’
At one’s heart of the issue in California could be the intransigence of the many stakeholders that are different the language of the bills. Along with Hall and Gray’s shell bills, which presently contain no language to speak of, two other bills have been introduced this legislative session.
Assemblyman Mike Gatto’s AB9 would permit just tribal operators and card spaces to apply for on-line poker licenses, while Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer’s AB167 would are the state’s racetracks.
Gatto’s bill, meanwhile, includes strict bad actor language which would bar an operator like PokerStars from entering the marketplace, while the Jones-Sawyer bill is more supple in its bad actor stance than the bill he presented a year ago, and appears to leave the door ajar for PokerStars.
Broadly, the stakeholders are divided in to two camps: the Pechanga coalition that is tribal which is against bad actors and also the racetracks, and the Morongo tribal coalition, which is available to both.
Pechanga Might Derail Process
Pechanga has suggested it remains steadfast on its position towards the racetracks that it might be prepared to reach a compromise on the PokerStars question, if the tribes are able to cooperate together in the market with the online poker giant, but.
The issue of 3d slots free the racetracks remains a big sticking point while this might be considered progress, at least in one direction. Because the legalization of online poker would affect tax policy in Ca, a two-thirds would be needed by it majority to be passed by the legislature, which probably means that it would need agreement from all events.
The pari-mutual racing industry, meanwhile, has stated it would oppose legislation that excluded it and Governor Jerry Brown has stated he will never sign such legislation into law. Unless Pechanga changes its brain, then, internet poker won’t be legalized in California this year.
